Verdrag

Facultatief Protocol inzake de verkoop van kinderen, kinderprostitutie en kinderpornografie bij het Verdrag inzake de rechten van het kind

Datum wijziging Betreft
04-12-2025 Partij

Partij

Singapore toegevoegd

  • Ondertekening: 25-11-2025
  • Bezwaren: Nee
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee

17-04-2023 Partij

Partij

Verenigd Koninkrijk toegevoegd

  • Man
    In werking: 14-04-2023

13-10-2022 Nieuw verdrag

Algemene gegevens

  • In werking: 18-01-2002

Koninkrijksdeel

Nederland (in Europa)

  • In werking: 23-09-2005

Nederland (Bonaire)

  • In werking: 10-10-2010

Nederland (Sint Eustatius)

  • In werking: 10-10-2010

Nederland (Saba)

  • In werking: 10-10-2010

Aruba

  • In werking: 17-10-2006

Curaçao

  • In werking: 20-09-2022

Partij

Afghanistan

  • Ratificatie: 19-09-2002 (T)
  • In werking: 19-10-2002

Albanië

  • Ratificatie: 05-02-2008 (T)
  • In werking: 05-03-2008

Algerije

  • Ratificatie: 27-12-2006 (T)
  • In werking: 27-01-2007

Andorra

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 30-04-2001 (R)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002

Angola

  • Ratificatie: 24-03-2005 (T)
  • In werking: 24-04-2005

Antigua en Barbuda

  • Ondertekening: 18-12-2001
  • Ratificatie: 30-04-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 30-05-2002

Armenië

  • Ondertekening: 24-09-2003
  • Ratificatie: 30-06-2005 (R)
  • In werking: 30-07-2005

Australië

  • Ondertekening: 18-12-2001
  • Ratificatie: 08-01-2007 (R)
  • In werking: 08-02-2007

Azerbeidzjan

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 03-07-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 03-08-2002

Bahama's

  • Ratificatie: 28-09-2015 (T)
  • In werking: 28-10-2015

Bahrein

  • Ratificatie: 21-09-2004 (T)
  • In werking: 21-10-2004

Bangladesh

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 06-09-2000 (R)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002

Belize

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 01-12-2003 (R)
  • In werking: 01-01-2004

Benin

  • Ondertekening: 22-02-2001
  • Ratificatie: 31-01-2005 (R)
  • In werking: 28-02-2005

Bhutan

  • Ondertekening: 15-09-2005
  • Ratificatie: 26-10-2009 (R)
  • In werking: 26-11-2009

Bolivia

  • Ondertekening: 10-11-2001
  • Ratificatie: 03-06-2003 (R)
  • In werking: 03-07-2003

Bosnië en Herzegovina

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 04-09-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 04-10-2002

Botswana

  • Ratificatie: 24-09-2003 (T)
  • In werking: 24-10-2003

Brazilië

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 27-01-2004 (R)
  • In werking: 27-02-2004

Brunei

  • Ratificatie: 21-11-2006 (T)
  • In werking: 21-12-2006

Bulgarije

  • Ondertekening: 08-06-2001
  • Ratificatie: 12-02-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 12-03-2002

Burkina Faso

  • Ondertekening: 16-11-2001
  • Ratificatie: 31-03-2006 (R)
  • In werking: 30-04-2006

Burundi

  • Ratificatie: 06-11-2007 (T)
  • In werking: 06-12-2007

Cambodja

  • Ondertekening: 27-06-2000
  • Ratificatie: 30-05-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 30-06-2002

Canada

  • Ondertekening: 10-11-2001
  • Ratificatie: 14-09-2005 (R)
  • In werking: 14-10-2005

Centraal-Afrikaanse Republiek

  • Ondertekening: 27-09-2010
  • Ratificatie: 24-10-2012 (R)
  • In werking: 24-11-2012

Chili

  • Ondertekening: 28-06-2000
  • Ratificatie: 06-02-2003 (R)
  • In werking: 06-03-2003

Comoren

  • Ratificatie: 23-02-2007 (T)
  • In werking: 23-03-2007

Congo, Democratische Republiek

  • Ratificatie: 11-11-2001 (T)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002

Congo, Republiek

  • Ratificatie: 27-10-2009 (T)
  • In werking: 27-11-2009

Costa Rica

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 09-04-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 09-05-2002

Cuba

  • Ondertekening: 13-10-2000
  • Ratificatie: 25-09-2001 (R)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002

Cyprus

  • Ondertekening: 08-02-2001
  • Ratificatie: 06-04-2006 (R)
  • In werking: 06-05-2006

Djibouti

  • Ondertekening: 14-06-2006
  • Ratificatie: 27-04-2011 (R)
  • In werking: 27-05-2011

Dominica

  • Ratificatie: 20-09-2002 (T)
  • In werking: 20-10-2002

Dominicaanse Republiek

  • Ratificatie: 06-12-2006 (T)
  • In werking: 06-01-2007

Duitsland

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 15-07-2009 (R)
  • In werking: 15-08-2009

Ecuador

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 30-01-2004 (R)
  • In werking: 29-02-2004

Egypte

  • Ratificatie: 12-07-2002 (T)
  • In werking: 12-08-2002

Equatoriaal-Guinea

  • Ratificatie: 07-02-2003 (T)
  • In werking: 07-03-2003

Eritrea

  • Ratificatie: 16-02-2005 (T)
  • In werking: 16-03-2005

Estland

  • Ondertekening: 24-09-2003
  • Ratificatie: 03-08-2004 (R)
  • In werking: 03-09-2004

Eswatini

  • Ratificatie: 24-09-2012 (T)
  • In werking: 24-10-2012

Ethiopië

  • Ratificatie: 25-03-2014 (T)
  • In werking: 25-04-2014

Fiji

  • Ondertekening: 16-09-2005
  • Ratificatie: 09-03-2021 (R)
  • In werking: 09-04-2021

Filipijnen

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 28-05-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 28-06-2002

Finland

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 01-06-2012 (R)
  • In werking: 01-07-2012

Frankrijk

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 05-02-2003 (R)
  • In werking: 05-03-2003

Gabon

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 01-10-2007 (R)
  • In werking: 01-11-2007

Gambia

  • Ondertekening: 21-12-2000
  • Ratificatie: 08-04-2010 (R)
  • In werking: 08-05-2010

Georgië

  • Ratificatie: 28-06-2005 (T)
  • In werking: 28-07-2005

Ghana

  • Ondertekening: 24-09-2003

Grenada

  • Ratificatie: 06-02-2012 (T)
  • In werking: 06-03-2012

Griekenland

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 22-02-2008 (R)
  • In werking: 22-03-2008

Guatemala

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 09-05-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 09-06-2002

Guinee

  • Ratificatie: 16-11-2011 (T)
  • In werking: 16-12-2011

Guinee-Bissau

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 01-11-2010 (R)
  • In werking: 01-12-2010

Guyana

  • Ratificatie: 30-07-2010 (T)
  • In werking: 30-08-2010

Haïti

  • Ondertekening: 15-08-2002
  • Ratificatie: 09-09-2014 (R)
  • In werking: 09-10-2014

Heilige Stoel

  • Ondertekening: 10-10-2000
  • Ratificatie: 24-10-2001 (R)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002

Honduras

  • Ratificatie: 08-05-2002 (T)
  • In werking: 08-06-2002

Hongarije

  • Ondertekening: 11-03-2002
  • Ratificatie: 24-02-2010 (R)
  • In werking: 24-03-2010

Ierland

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000

IJsland

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 09-07-2001 (R)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002

India

  • Ondertekening: 15-11-2004
  • Ratificatie: 16-08-2005 (R)
  • In werking: 16-09-2005

Indonesië

  • Ondertekening: 24-09-2001
  • Ratificatie: 24-09-2012 (R)
  • In werking: 24-10-2012

Irak

  • Ratificatie: 24-06-2008 (T)
  • In werking: 24-07-2008

Iran

  • Ratificatie: 26-09-2007 (T)
  • In werking: 26-10-2007

Italië

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 09-05-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 09-06-2002

Ivoorkust

  • Ratificatie: 19-09-2011 (T)
  • In werking: 19-10-2011

Jamaica

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 26-08-2011 (R)
  • In werking: 26-09-2011

Japan

  • Ondertekening: 10-05-2002
  • Ratificatie: 24-01-2005 (R)
  • In werking: 24-02-2005

Jemen

  • Ratificatie: 15-12-2004 (T)
  • In werking: 15-01-2005

Jordanië

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 04-12-2006 (R)
  • In werking: 04-01-2007

Kaapverdië

  • Ratificatie: 10-05-2002 (T)
  • In werking: 10-06-2002

Kameroen

  • Ondertekening: 05-10-2001

Kazachstan

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 24-08-2001 (R)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002

Kenia

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000

Kirgistan

  • Ratificatie: 12-02-2003 (T)
  • In werking: 12-03-2003

Kroatië

  • Ondertekening: 08-05-2002
  • Ratificatie: 13-05-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 13-06-2002

Lesotho

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 24-09-2003 (R)
  • In werking: 24-10-2003

Letland

  • Ondertekening: 01-02-2002
  • Ratificatie: 22-02-2006 (R)
  • In werking: 22-03-2006

Libanon

  • Ondertekening: 10-10-2001
  • Ratificatie: 08-11-2004 (R)
  • In werking: 08-12-2004

Liberia

  • Ondertekening: 22-09-2004

Libië

  • Ratificatie: 18-06-2004 (T)
  • In werking: 18-07-2004

Liechtenstein

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 30-01-2013 (R)
  • In werking: 28-02-2013

Litouwen

  • Ratificatie: 05-08-2004 (T)
  • In werking: 05-09-2004

Luxemburg

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 02-09-2011 (R)
  • In werking: 02-10-2011

Madagaskar

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 22-09-2004 (R)
  • In werking: 22-10-2004

Malawi

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 07-10-2009 (R)
  • In werking: 07-11-2009

Malediven

  • Ondertekening: 10-05-2002
  • Ratificatie: 10-05-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 10-06-2002

Mali

  • Ratificatie: 16-05-2002 (T)
  • In werking: 16-06-2002

Malta

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 28-09-2010 (R)
  • In werking: 28-10-2010

Marokko

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 02-10-2001 (R)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002

Marshalleilanden

  • Ratificatie: 29-01-2019 (T)
  • In werking: 28-02-2019

Mauritanië

  • Ratificatie: 23-04-2007 (T)
  • In werking: 23-05-2007

Mauritius

  • Ondertekening: 11-11-2001
  • Ratificatie: 14-06-2011 (R)
  • In werking: 14-07-2011

Mexico

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 15-03-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 15-04-2002

Micronesia

  • Ondertekening: 08-05-2002
  • Ratificatie: 23-04-2012 (R)
  • In werking: 23-05-2012

Monaco

  • Ondertekening: 26-06-2000
  • Ratificatie: 24-09-2008 (R)
  • In werking: 24-10-2008

Mongolië

  • Ondertekening: 12-11-2001
  • Ratificatie: 27-06-2003 (R)
  • In werking: 27-07-2003

Montenegro

  • Ratificatie: 23-10-2006 (VG)
  • In werking: 03-06-2006

Mozambique

  • Ratificatie: 06-03-2003 (T)
  • In werking: 06-04-2003

Myanmar

  • Ratificatie: 16-01-2012 (T)
  • In werking: 16-02-2012

Namibië

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 16-04-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 16-05-2002

Nauru

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000

Nederlanden, het Koninkrijk der

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 23-08-2005 (R)
  • In werking: 23-09-2005

Nepal

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 20-01-2006 (R)
  • In werking: 20-02-2006

Nicaragua

  • Ratificatie: 02-12-2004 (T)
  • In werking: 02-01-2005

Niger

  • Ondertekening: 27-03-2002
  • Ratificatie: 26-10-2004 (R)
  • In werking: 26-11-2004

Nigeria

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 27-09-2010 (R)
  • In werking: 27-10-2010

Noord-Korea

  • Ondertekening: 09-09-2014
  • Ratificatie: 10-11-2014 (R)
  • In werking: 10-12-2014

Noord-Macedonië

  • Ondertekening: 17-07-2001
  • Ratificatie: 17-10-2003 (R)
  • In werking: 17-11-2003

Noorwegen

  • Ondertekening: 13-06-2000
  • Ratificatie: 02-10-2001 (R)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002

Oekraïne

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 03-07-2003 (R)
  • In werking: 03-08-2003

Oezbekistan

  • Ratificatie: 23-12-2008 (T)
  • In werking: 23-01-2009

Oostenrijk

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 06-05-2004 (R)
  • In werking: 06-06-2004

Oost-Timor

  • Ratificatie: 16-04-2003 (T)
  • In werking: 16-05-2003

Pakistan

  • Ondertekening: 26-09-2001
  • Ratificatie: 05-07-2011 (R)
  • In werking: 05-08-2011

Panama

  • Ondertekening: 31-10-2000
  • Ratificatie: 09-02-2001 (R)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002

Paraguay

  • Ondertekening: 13-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 18-08-2003 (R)
  • In werking: 18-09-2003

Peru

  • Ondertekening: 01-11-2000
  • Ratificatie: 08-05-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 08-06-2002

Polen

  • Ondertekening: 13-02-2002
  • Ratificatie: 04-02-2005 (R)
  • In werking: 04-03-2005

Portugal

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 16-05-2003 (R)
  • In werking: 16-06-2003

Roemenië

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 18-10-2001 (R)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002

Russische Federatie

  • Ondertekening: 26-09-2012
  • Ratificatie: 24-09-2013 (R)
  • In werking: 24-10-2013

Rwanda

  • Ratificatie: 14-03-2002 (T)
  • In werking: 14-04-2002

Saint Lucia

  • Ondertekening: 22-09-2011
  • Ratificatie: 08-10-2013 (R)
  • In werking: 08-11-2013

Saint Vincent en de Grenadines

  • Ratificatie: 15-09-2005 (T)
  • In werking: 15-10-2005

Salomonseilanden

  • Ondertekening: 24-09-2009
  • Ratificatie: 05-05-2022 (R)
  • In werking: 05-06-2022

Samoa

  • Ratificatie: 29-04-2016 (T)
  • In werking: 29-05-2016

San Marino

  • Ondertekening: 05-06-2000
  • Ratificatie: 26-09-2011 (R)
  • In werking: 26-10-2011

Saudi-Arabië

  • Ratificatie: 18-08-2010 (T)
  • In werking: 18-09-2010

Senegal

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 05-11-2003 (R)
  • In werking: 05-12-2003

Servië

  • Ondertekening: 08-10-2001
  • Ratificatie: 10-10-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 10-11-2002

Seychellen

  • Ondertekening: 23-01-2001
  • Ratificatie: 11-12-2012 (R)
  • In werking: 11-01-2013

Sierra Leone

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 17-09-2001 (R)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002

Slovenië

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 23-09-2004 (R)
  • In werking: 23-10-2004

Slowakije

  • Ondertekening: 30-11-2001
  • Ratificatie: 25-06-2004 (R)
  • In werking: 25-07-2004

Spanje

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 18-12-2001 (R)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002

Sri Lanka

  • Ondertekening: 08-05-2002
  • Ratificatie: 22-09-2006 (R)
  • In werking: 22-10-2006

Sudan

  • Ratificatie: 02-11-2004 (T)
  • In werking: 02-12-2004

Suriname

  • Ondertekening: 10-05-2002
  • Ratificatie: 18-05-2012 (R)
  • In werking: 18-06-2012

Tadzjikistan

  • Ratificatie: 05-08-2002 (T)
  • In werking: 05-09-2002

Tanzania

  • Ratificatie: 24-04-2003 (T)
  • In werking: 24-05-2003

Thailand

  • Ratificatie: 11-01-2006 (T)
  • In werking: 11-02-2006

Togo

  • Ondertekening: 15-11-2001
  • Ratificatie: 02-07-2004 (R)
  • In werking: 02-08-2004

Tsjaad

  • Ondertekening: 03-05-2002
  • Ratificatie: 28-08-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 28-09-2002

Tsjechië

  • Ondertekening: 26-01-2005
  • Ratificatie: 26-08-2013 (R)
  • In werking: 26-09-2013

Tunesië

  • Ondertekening: 22-04-2002
  • Ratificatie: 13-09-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 13-10-2002

Turkmenistan

  • Ratificatie: 28-03-2005 (T)
  • In werking: 28-04-2005

Uganda

  • Ratificatie: 30-11-2001 (T)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002

Uruguay

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 03-07-2003 (R)
  • In werking: 03-08-2003

Vanuatu

  • Ondertekening: 16-09-2005
  • Ratificatie: 17-05-2007 (R)
  • In werking: 17-06-2007

Venezuela

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 08-05-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 08-06-2002

Verenigd Koninkrijk

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 20-02-2009 (R)
  • In werking: 20-03-2009
  • Alderney
    In werking: 04-11-2020Guernsey
    In werking: 04-11-2020Jersey
    In werking: 29-04-2014

Zambia

  • Ondertekening: 29-09-2008

Zimbabwe

  • Ratificatie: 14-02-2012 (T)
  • In werking: 14-03-2012

Zuid-Afrika

  • Ratificatie: 30-06-2003 (T)
  • In werking: 30-07-2003

Zuid-Sudan

  • Ratificatie: 27-09-2018 (T)
  • In werking: 27-10-2018

Zwitserland

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 19-09-2006 (R)
  • In werking: 19-10-2006

Argentinië

  • Ondertekening: 01-04-2002
  • Ratificatie: 25-09-2003 (R)
  • In werking: 25-10-2003
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    25-09-2003
    With reference to article 2, the Argentine Republic would prefer a broader definition of sale of children, as set out in the Inter-American Convention on International Traffic in Minors which Argentina has ratified and which, in its article 2, expressly defines traffic as the abduction, removal or retention, or attempted abduction, removal or retention, of a minor for unlawful purposes or by unlawful means. Therefore, under article 41 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, this meaning shall continue to apply. For the same reasons, the Argentine Republic believes that the sale of children should be criminalized in all cases and not only in those enumerated in article 3, paragraph 1 (a). Concerning article 3, the Argentine Republic further states that it has not signed international instruments on the international adoption of minors, has entered a reservation in respect of subparagraphs (b), (c), (d) and (e) of article 21 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child dealing with international adoption, and does not permit international adoption of children domiciled or resident in its jurisdiction. Concerning article 7, the Argentine Republic construes the term 'confiscation' (confiscación) to mean the seizure of goods and proceeds as part of a sentence or penalty (decomisar).* * Translator's note: The meaning of the Spanish term "decomisar" is not as broad as the English "seizure". "Decomisar" means "seizure" during the sentencing or penalty phase only. (Seizure as a preventive measure is rendered with "incautación".)


Belarus

  • Ratificatie: 23-01-2002 (T)
  • In werking: 23-02-2002
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    23-01-2002
    The Republic of Belarus, pursuant to article 3 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict, declares that voluntary recruitment of citizens into the armed forces of the Republic of Belarus shall occur upon the attainment by them of 18 years of age. Admission to a military academy, to which citizens aged 17 years or over, including those who attain 17 years of age during the year in which they are admitted to such an academy, are entitled, in accordance with article 43 of the Act of the Republic of Belarus of 5 November 1992 on Military Obligations and Military Service, shall constitute an exception to the above. Such admission shall not be forced or coerced. The legislation of the Republic of Belarus guarantees that entry into military service as a cadet at a military academy: Shall be voluntary; Shall occur with the informed consent of the person's parents or legal guardians; Shall occur on condition that such persons are fully informed of the duties involved in military service; Shall be permitted on condition that such persons provide reliable proof of age prior to acceptance into military service.


België

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 17-03-2006 (R)
  • In werking: 17-04-2006
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    17-03-2006
    The expression 'child pornography' is understood to mean the visual representation of a child participating in real or simulated sexual activities or the visual representation of the sexual parts of a child, when the dominant characteristic is a description for sexual purposes.

    voorbehoud
    06-09-2000
    This signature is equally binding on the French community, the Flemish community and the German-speaking community.


China

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 03-12-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 03-01-2003
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • Macau SAR
    In werking: 03-01-2003
  • voorbehoud
    03-12-2002
    1. In accordance with the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China and as suggested by the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the application of the Protocol to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China requires prior enactment of domestic legislation by the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, and the Protocol shall not apply to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China until the Government of China notifies otherwise; 2. In accordance with the Basic Law of the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China and as suggested by the Government of the Macao Special Administrative Region, the Protocol shall apply to the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China.


Colombia

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 11-11-2003 (R)
  • In werking: 11-12-2003
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    11-11-2003
    Concerning article 7 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, Colombia declares that, in accordance with its domestic legal system, it construes the penalty of "confiscation" (confiscación) only as seizure or forfeiture during the penalty phase.


Denemarken

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 24-07-2003 (R)
  • In werking: 24-08-2003
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    24-07-2003
    In connection with the deposit of Denmark's instrument of ratification of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography Denmark declares that she interprets the words "any representation"in article 2 (c), of the Protocol to mean "any visual representation". Denmark further declares that the possession of pornographic visual representation of a person, who has completed his or her fifteenth year and who has consented to the said possession, shall not be considered covered by the binding provisions of the Protocol. With a territorial exclusion in respect of the Faroe Islands and Greenland

    voorbehoud
    07-10-2016
    Withdrawal of declaration relating to the territorial exclusion in respact of the Faroe Islands and Greenland.


El Salvador

  • Ondertekening: 13-09-2002
  • Ratificatie: 17-05-2004 (R)
  • In werking: 17-06-2004
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    17-05-2004
    The Government of the Republic of El Salvador recognizes the extradiction of nationals on the basis of the second and third clauses of article 28 of the Constitution, which stipulate that "Extradition will be regulated under international treaties; in cases involving Salvadorans, extradition will proceed only if the treaty in question expressly allows it and the treaty has been approved by the respective legislatures of the signatory countries. In any case, the terms of the treaty must include the principle of reciprocity and give Salvadorans all the guarantees with respect to trials and penalties that this Constitution provides. The accused will be extradited if the offence was committed in the territory of the requesting country, unless the offence is international in scope, and in no case for political offences, even though common criminal offences may have occured as a result.


Israël

  • Ondertekening: 14-11-2001
  • Ratificatie: 23-07-2008 (R)
  • In werking: 23-08-2008
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    29-03-2018
    The Permanent Mission of Israel to the United Nations presents its compliments to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, in his capacity as depositary of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, dated 25 May 2000, and has the honor to refer to the Palestinian request to accede to this Protocol (Reference number C.N.796.2017.TREATIES-IV.11.c). ‘Palestine’ does not satisfy the criteria for statehood under international law and lacks the legal capacity to join the aforesaid Optional Protocol both under general international law and the terms of bilateral Israeli-Palestinian agreements. The Government of Israel does not recognize ‘Palestine’ as a State, and wishes to place on record, for the sake of clarity, its position that it does not consider ‘Palestine’ a party to the [Protocol] and regards the Palestinian request for accession as being without legal validity and without effect upon Israel’s treaty relations under the [Protocol].


Kiribati

  • Ratificatie: 16-09-2015 (T)
  • In werking: 16-10-2015
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    16-09-2015
    … the Republic of Kiribati has no national armed forces, and a declaration as to the minimum age for recruitment is therefore not applicable in the case of the Republic of Kiribati.


Koeweit

  • Ratificatie: 26-08-2004 (T)
  • In werking: 26-09-2004
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    26-08-2004
    ... with a reservation in respect of paragraph 5 of article 3 of the second protocol.


Laos

  • Ratificatie: 20-09-2006 (T)
  • In werking: 20-10-2006
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    20-09-2006
    The Lao People's Democratic Republic [...] does not consider itself bound by Article 5 (2) of the said Optional Protocol.


Maleisië

  • Ratificatie: 12-04-2012 (T)
  • In werking: 12-05-2012
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    12-04-2012
    1. The Government of Malaysia declares that the words 'any representation' in article 2 paragraph (c), shall be interpreted to mean 'any visual representation'. 2. The Government of Malaysia understands that article 3 paragraph (1)(a)(ii) of the said Optional Protocol is applicable only to States Parties to the Convention on Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption, done at the Hague on 29 May 1993.


Moldavië

  • Ondertekening: 08-02-2002
  • Ratificatie: 12-04-2007 (R)
  • In werking: 12-05-2007
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    12-04-2007
    Until the full re-establishment of the territorial integrity of the Republic of Moldova, the provisions of the convention shall be applied only on the territory controlled effectively by the authorities of the Republic of Moldova.


Nieuw-Zeeland

  • Ondertekening: 07-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 20-09-2011 (R)
  • In werking: 20-10-2011
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    20-09-2011
    [...] declares that, consistent with the constitutional status of Tokelau and taking into account the commitment of the Government of New Zealand to the development of self-government for Tokelau through an act of self-determination under the Charter of the United Nations, this ratification shall not extend to Tokelau unless and until a Declaration to this effect is lodged by the Government of New Zealand with the Depositary on the basis of appropriate consultation with that territory; [...]


Oman

  • Ratificatie: 17-09-2004 (T)
  • In werking: 17-10-2004
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Ja
  • voorbehoud
    17-09-2004
    ... subject to the Sultanate's reservations to the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

    bezwaar op voorbehoud

    Bezwaar Frankrijk, 18-11-2005

    The Government of the French Republic has examined the reservation entered by the Government of the Sultanate of Oman upon acceding, on 17 September 2004, to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, concerning the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography by which the Sultanate extends to the Protocol the reservations it entered with respect to the Convention. While indicating that it was acceding to the Protocol and voicing, in a general manner, reservations with respect to provisions of the Protocol that it regards as violating Islamic sharia rules, the Sultanate of Oman has entered a reservation of a general, indeterminate nature that leaves other States parties unable to establish which provisions of the Convention the reservation currently concerns and which provisions are likely to be concerned in the future. The Government of the French Republic believes that the reservation could deprive the provisions of the Convention of any effect and is entering an objection thereto. This objection shall not prevent the entry into force of the Convention between France and the Sultanate of Oman.

    Bezwaar Hongarije, 24-02-2010

    The Government of the Republic of Hungary has examined the reservations made by the Sultanate of Oman on 17 September 2004 to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography. The Government of the Republic of Hungary notes that the Sultanate of Oman does not consider itself bound by the provisions of the Optional Protocol that do not accord with the Islamic law or the legislation in force in the Sultanate, and also notes that the Sultanate of Oman intends to apply the Optional Protocol within the limits imposed by the material resources available. The Government of the Republic of Hungary is of the view that the Sultanate of Oman has made reservations of a general nature which do not define clearly to what extent it considers itself bound by the provisions of the Optional Protocol. The Government of the Republic of Hungary notes that according to Article 19 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties reservations that are incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty shall not be permitted. The Government of the Republic of Hungary therefore objects to the above-mentioned reservations. The objection shall not preclude the entry into force of the Optional Protocol between the Republic of Hungary and the Sultanate of Oman. The Optional Protocol enters into force in its entirety between the Republic of Hungary and the Sultanate of Oman, without the Sultanate of Oman benefiting from its reservations.

    Bezwaar Noorwegen, 19-01-2006

    The Permanent Mission of Norway to the United Nations presents its compliments to the Secretary-General of the United Nations and has the honour to convey that Norway has examined the second and third reservations made by the Government of the Sultanate of Oman on 17 September 2004 on accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography (New York, 25 May 2000) which concern Islamic and domestic law and limits imposed by the material resources available. The Government of Norway is of the view that these general reservations raise doubts as to the full commitment of the Sultanate of Oman to the object and purpose of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography and would like to recall that according to customary international law as codified in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, a reservation incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention shall not be permitted. The Government of Norway therefore objects to the aforesaid reservations made by the Government of the Sultanate of Oman to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography. This objection does not preclude the entry into force in its entirety, of the Convention between the Kingdom of Norway and the Sultanate of Oman, without the latter benefiting from these reservations.

    Bezwaar Tsjechië, 26-08-2013

    The Government of the Czech Republic has examined the reservation to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography (hereinafter as the 'Optional Protocol') made by the Government of the Sultanate of Oman upon accession to the Optional Protocol. Since in the reservation the Sultanate of Oman announces that the scope of application of the provisions of the Optional Protocol will be limited by Islamic law, by the legislation in force in the Sultanate, and by the material resources available, the Government of the Czech Republic believes that the reservation raises doubts about the extent to which the Sultanate of Oman undertakes to honour its obligations arising from the Optional Protocol. The Government of the Czech Republic believes that this reservation is incompatible with the object and purpose of the Optional Protocol. The Government of the Czech Republic points out that customary international law codified in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Vienna, 23 May 1969), in particular in its Article 19, does not be permit such reservations. The Government of the Czech Republic therefore objects to the aforesaid reservation to the Optional Protocol made by the Sultanate of Oman. This objection does not preclude the entry into force of the Optional Protocol between the Czech Republic and the Sultanate of Oman, without the Sultanate of Oman benefiting from its reservation.


Palestina

  • Ratificatie: 29-12-2017 (T)
  • In werking: 29-01-2018
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    18-03-2019
    The Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine to the United Nations presents his compliments to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, in his capacity as Depositary, and has the honor to refer to depositary notification C.N.178.2018.TREATIES-IV.11.c, dated 4 April 2018, conveying a communication of Israel regarding the accession of the State of Palestine to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, 25 May 2000. The Government of the State of Palestine regrets the position of Israel and wishes to recall the United Nations General Assembly resolution 67/19 of 29 November 2012 according to which Palestine was accorded a ‘Non-member Observer State status in the United Nations’. In this regard, Palestine is a State recognized by the United Nations General Assembly on behalf of the international community. As a State Party to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, 25 May 2000, which entered into force on 29 January 2018 for the State of Palestine, the State of Palestine will exercise its rights and honor its obligations with respect to all States Parties. The State of Palestine trusts that its rights and obligations will be equally respected by its fellow States Parties.

    voorbehoud
    18-03-2019
    The Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine to the United Nations presents his compliments to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, in his capacity as Depositary, and has the honor to refer to depositary notification C.N.192.2018.TREATIES-IV.11.c, dated 4 April 2018, conveying a communication of the United States of America regarding the accession of the State of Palestine to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, 25 May 2000. The Government of the State of Palestine regrets the position of the United States of America and wishes to recall the United Nations General Assembly resolution 67/19 of 29 November 2012 according to which Palestine was accorded a ‘Non-member Observer State status in the United Nations’. In this regard, Palestine is a State recognized by the United Nations General Assembly on behalf of the international community. As a State Party to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, 25 May 2000, which entered into force on 29 January 2018 for the State of Palestine, the State of Palestine will exercise its rights and honor its obligations with respect to all States Parties. The State of Palestine trusts that its rights and obligations will be equally respected by its fellow States Parties.


Qatar

  • Ratificatie: 14-12-2001 (T)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    14-12-2001
    ... subject to a general reservation regarding any provisions in the protocol that are in conflict with the Islamic Shariah.


Syrië

  • Ratificatie: 15-05-2003 (T)
  • In werking: 15-06-2003
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Ja
  • voorbehoud
    15-05-2003
    A reservation is entered to the provisions set forth in article 3, paragraph 5, and article 3, paragraph 1 (a) (ii) of the Optional Protocol on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, which relate to adoption. Ratification of the two Optional Protocols by the Syrian Arab Republic shall not in any event imply recognition of Israel and shall not lead to entry into any dealings with Israel in the matters governed by the provisions of the Protocols.

    bezwaar op voorbehoud

    Bezwaar Israël, 30-09-2003

    The Government of the State of Israel has noted that the instrument of accesion of the Syrian Arab Republic to the above mentioned Protocol contains a declaration with respect to the State of Israel. The Government of the State of Israel is of the view that the declaration which is political in its nature, is incompatible with the purposes and objectives of this Protocol. The Government of the State of Israel therefore objects to the aforesaid declaration made by the Syrian Arab Republic to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography.

    Bezwaar Israël, 23-07-2008

    The Government of the State of Israel has noted that the instrument of accession of the Syrian Arab Republic of the abovementioned Protocol which appears in the Depositary Notification Ref: C.N.679.2003.TREATIES-15 of 2 July 2003, contains a declaration with respect to the State of Israel. The Government of the State of Israel considers that such declaration, which is explicitly of a political nature, is incompatible with the purposes and objectives of the Protocol. The Government of the State of Israel therefore objects to the aforesaid declaration made by the Syrian Arab Republic.


Turkije

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 19-08-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 19-09-2002
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Ja
  • voorbehoud
    19-08-2002
    The Republic of Turkey declares that it will implement the provisions of the existing Optional Protocol only to the States Parties which it recognizes and with which it has diplomatic relations.

    bezwaar op voorbehoud

    Bezwaar Cyprus, 12-08-2003

    ...The Government of the Republic of Cyprus has examined the declaration made by the Government of the Republic of Turkey upon ratifying the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography on 19 August 2002, in respect of the implementation of the provisions of the Convention only to the States Parties which it recognizes and with which it has diplomatic relations. In the view of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus, this declaration amounts to a reservation. This reservation creates uncertainty as to the States Parties in respect of which Turkey is undertaking the obligations in the Convention and raises doubt as to the commitment of Turkey to the object and purpose of the said Optional Protocol. The Government of the Republic of Cyprus therefore objects to the reservation made by the Government of the Republic of Turkey to the Optional Protocol to the Convention of the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography. This reservation or the objection to it shall not preclude the entry into force of the Convention between the Republic of Cyprus and the Republic of Turkey.

    Bezwaar Cyprus, 06-04-2006

    The Government of the Republic of Cyprus wishes to reiterate its objection of 12th August 2003, with regard to the declaration made by Turkey upon ratification.

    Bezwaar Zweden, 11-07-2003

    The Government of Sweden has examined the declaration made by Turkey upon ratifying the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography. The declaration states that Turkey will implement the provisions of the Optional Protocol only to the States Parties which it recognises and with which it has diplomatic relations. This statement in fact amounts, in the view of the Government of Sweden, to a reservation. The reservation makes it unclear to what extent Turkey considers itself bound by the obligations of the Optional Protocol. In absence of further clarification, therefore, the reservation raises doubt as to the commitment of Turkey to the object and purpose of the Optional Protocol. The Government of Sweden would like to recall that, according to customary international law as codified in the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties, a reservation incompatible with the object and purpose of a treaty shall not be permitted. It is in the common interest of States that treaties to which they have chosen to become parties are respected as to their object and purpose, by all parties, and that States are prepared to undertake any legislative changes necessary to comply with their obligations under the treaties. The Government of Sweden therefore objects to the aforesaid reservation made by Turkey to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography. This objection does not preclude the entry into force of the Optional Protocol between Turkey and Sweden. The Optional Protocol enters into force in its entirety between the two States, without Turkey benefiting from its reservation.


Verenigde Arabische Emiraten

  • Ratificatie: 02-03-2016 (T)
  • In werking: 02-04-2016
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Ja
  • voorbehoud
    02-03-2016
    ... with a reservation regarding article 3, paragraph 5.

    bezwaar op voorbehoud

    Bezwaar Duitsland, 28-02-2017

    The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany has examined the reservation made by the United Arab Emirates upon its [accession to] the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography of 25 May 2000 with respect to Article 3 (5) thereof. The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany considers that the reservation to Article 3 (5) is incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention. The Government of the Federal Republic of Germany therefore objects to this reservation. This objection shall not preclude the entry into force of the Convention between the Federal Republic of Germany and the United Arab Emirates.

    Bezwaar Verenigd Koninkrijk, 01-03-2017

    The Permanent Mission of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland… wishes to lodge an objection to a reservation made by the United Arab Emirates upon accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography. The reservation is as follows: Reservation “… with a reservation regarding article 3, paragraph 5.” Article 3 5. States Parties shall take all appropriate legal and administrative measures to ensure that all persons involved in the adoption of a child act in conformity with applicable international legal instruments. The UK Government notes that there is no specific detail provided in the reservation and as such it does not clearly define for the other States Parties to the Convention the extent to which the reserving State has accepted the obligations of the Convention. The UK Government therefore objects to the aforesaid reservation.


Verenigde Staten van Amerika

  • Ondertekening: 05-07-2000
  • Ratificatie: 23-12-2002 (R)
  • In werking: 23-01-2003
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    29-03-2018
    The United States Mission to the United Nations presents its compliments to the Executive Office of the Secretary-General of the United Nations and refers to the U.N. Secretary-General’s depositary notification C.N.796.2017.TREATIES-IV.11.c, dated January 2, 2018, regarding the purported accession by the ‘State of Palestine’ to Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, done at New York May 25, 2000 (the Protocol), for which the Secretary-General of the United Nations is the depositary. The Government of the United States of America does not believe the ‘State of Palestine’ qualifies as a sovereign State and does not recognize it as such. Accession to the Protocol is limited to sovereign States. Therefore, the Government of the United States of America believes that the ‘State of Palestine’ is not qualified to accede to the Protocol and affirms that it will not consider itself to be in a treaty relationship with the ‘State of Palestine’ under the Protocol.

    voorbehoud
    23-12-2002
    To the extent that the domestic law of the United States does not provide for jurisdiction over an offense described in Article 3 (1) of the Protocol if the offense is committed on board a ship or aircraft registered in the United States, the obligation with respect to jurisdiction over that offense shall not apply to the United States until such time as the United States may notify the Secretary-General of the United Nations that United States domestic law is in full conformity with the requirements of Article 4 (1) of the Protocol. The Senate's advice and consent is subject to the following understandings: (1) NO ASSUMPTION OF OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD. -The United States understands that the United States assumes no obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child by becoming a party to the Protocol. (2) THE TERM "CHILD PORNOGRAPHY". The United States understands that the term "sale of children" as defined in Article 2(a) of the Protocol, is intended to cover any transaction in which remuneration or other consideration is given and received under circumstances in which a person who does not have a lawful right to custody of the child thereby obtains de facto control over the child. (3) THE TERM "CHILD PORNOGRAPHY". -The United States understands the term "child pornography", as defined in Article 2(c) of the Protocol, to mean the visual representation of a child engaged in real or simulated sexual activities or of the genitalia of a child where the dominant characteristic is depiction for a sexual purpose. (4) THE TERM "TRANSFER OF ORGANS FOR PROFIT". -The United States understands that- (A) the term "transfer of organs for profit", as used in Article 3(1)(a)(i) of the Protocol, does not cover any situation in which a child donates an organ pursuant to lawful consent; and (B) the term "profit", as used in Article 3(1)(a)(i) of the Protocol, does not include the lawful payment of a reasonable amount associated with the transfer of organs, including any payment for the expense of travel, housing, lost wages, or medical costs. (5) THE TERMS "APPLICABLE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL INSTRUMENTS" AND "IMPROPERLY INDUCING CONSENT". - (A) UNDERSTANDING OF "APPLICABLE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL INSTRUMENTS". -The United States understands that the term "applicable international legal instruments" in Articles 3 (1) (a) (ii) and 3 (5) of the Protocol refers to the Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption done at The Hague on May 29, 1993 (in this paragraph referred to as "The Hague Convention"). (B) NO OBLIGATION TO TAKE CERTAIN ACTION. -The United States is not a party to The Hague Convention, but expects to become a party. Accordingly, until such time as the United States becomes a party to The Hague Convention, it understands that it is not obligated to criminalize conduct proscribed by Article 3(1)(a)(ii) of the Protocol or to take all appropriate legal and administrative measures required by Article 3(5) of the Protocol. (C) UNDERSTANDING OF "IMPROPERLY INDUCING CONSENT". -The United States understands that the term "Improperly inducing consent" in Article 3(1)(a)(ii) of the Protocol means knowingly and willfully inducing consent by offering or giving compensation for the relinquishment of parental rights. (6) IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROTOCOL IN THE FEDERAL SYSTEM OF THE UNITED STATES. -The United States understands that the Protocol shall be implemented by the Federal Government to the extent that it exercises jurisdiction over the matters covered therein, and otherwise by the State and local governments. To the extent that State and local governments exercise jurisdiction over such matters, the Federal Government shall as necessary, take appropriate measures to ensure the fulfillment of the Protocol.


Vietnam

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 20-12-2001 (R)
  • In werking: 18-01-2002
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    20-12-2001
    ... the Socialist Republic of Vietnam makes its reservation to article 5 (1), (2), (3), and (4) of the said Protocol.

    voorbehoud
    26-03-2009
    Withdrawal of the following reservation: "... the Socialist Republic of Vietnam makes its reservation to article 5 (1) (2) (3) and (4) of the said Protocol."


Zuid-Korea

  • Ondertekening: 06-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 24-09-2004 (R)
  • In werking: 24-10-2004
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    24-09-2004
    The Government of the Republic of Korea understands that Article 3(1)(a)(ii) of the aforementioned Protocol is applicable only to States Parties to the Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption, done at The Hague on 29 May 1993.


Zweden

  • Ondertekening: 08-09-2000
  • Ratificatie: 19-01-2007 (R)
  • In werking: 19-02-2007
  • Bezwaren: Ja
  • Voorbehoud / verklaring: Nee
  • voorbehoud
    19-01-2007
    ... Sweden interprets the word "any representation" in article 2 c) of the Protocol as "visual representation".

    voorbehoud
    08-09-2000
    Reference is made to earlier statements submitted by the EU in connection with the Working group's ad-referendum adoption of the Optional Protocol on 4 February 2000 and the national statement submitted by Sweden at the same occasion as well as the Swedish statement submitted in connection with the adoption of the Protocol by the General Assembly on 25 May 2000. Furthermore Sweden interprets the words 'any representation' in article 2 c) as 'visual representation' .