Print
Download XML
SubscribeThe Hague Agreement concerning the international deposit of industrial designs of 6 November 1925 revised at London on 2 June 1934 and at The Hague on 28 November 1960
Parties with reservations, declarations and objections
| Party | Reservations / Declarations | Objections |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | Yes | No |
| Hungary | Yes | No |
| Luxembourg | Yes | No |
| Morocco | Yes | No |
| Netherlands, the Kingdom of the | Yes | No |
| Ukraine | Yes | No |
Belgium
22-02-1979
The Kingdom of Belgium, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
have introduced the Uniform Benelux Designs Law into their national legislation by
virtue of the provisions of the Benelux Designs Convention, signed at Brussels on
October 25, 1966.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 13 of the said Convention, the Convention
entered into force on January 1, 1974, and the Uniform Law on January 1, 1975.
Considering Article 30 of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit
of Industrial Designs, as revised at The Hague on November 28, 1960, and amended by
Article 7(3) of the Complementary Act of Stockholm of July 14, 1967, to the said Agreement,
Considering Articles 5 and 8 of the Protocol of Geneva to the Hague Agreement Concerning
the International Deposit of International Designs, of August 29, 1975,
The Government of the [Kingdom of Belgium] [Grand Duchy of Luxembourg] [Kingdom of
the Netherlands] has the honor to notify the Director General of the World Intellectual
Property Organization of the following:
1. An Office common to the three Benelux countries (Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands)
has been instituted under the name "Benelux Designs Office."
The seat of the Office is at The Hague (the Netherlands). The Benelux Designs Office
was substituted for the national Office of each Benelux country as from January 1,
1975.
2. The application of the Convention referred to above shall be confined to the territories
of the High Contracting Parties in Europe, in accordance with Article 11 thereof.
These territories shall be deemed to be a single State for the application of Articles
2 to 17 of the 1960 Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit
of Industrial Designs and for the application of Articles 2 and 3 of the 1975 Geneva
Protocol to the said Agreement.
One consequence of territorial unification to which attention should be drawn is that
a renunciation--limited to part of the Benelux territory--of protection resulting
from an international deposit shall be effective throughout that territory, notwithstanding
any statement to the contrary made by the proprietor (Article 18(2) of the Uniform
Benelux Law).
Similarly, assignments or other transfers not made for the entire Benelux territory
shall be null and void (Article 13 of the Uniform Benelux Law).
In addition, no limitation of a license, other than a restriction as to its duration,
shall have any effect regarding the application of the Uniform Law (Article 13(2)
of the Uniform Benelux Law).
The Benelux Designs office shall in future be entitled to receive payment on behalf
of the three Countries of the fees referred to in Article 15, paragraph (1), item
2, of the 1960 Act of The Hague Agreement, which is applicable also by virtue of the
1975 Geneva Protocol, it being understood that those countries shall not be treated
as separate countries for the application of the said provision. The three Governments
shall demand to be officially notified of the total amounts distributed according
to this procedure.
3. It is evident that the three Benelux countries shall remain three separate countries
with respect to their representation in the Assembly of the Hague Special Union. They
express the wish that their common Office, that is, the Benelux Designs Office, may
be represented by its Director, in the capacity of observer in the said Assembly and
at meetings concerning The Hague Union.
4. With a view to simplifying access to documentation concerning international deposits,
Belgium and Luxembourg express the wish that publications and notifications from the
International Bureau may be addressed also to their Industrial Property Services in
Brussels and Luxembourg.
Hungary
07-03-1984
[...] Hungary does not consider itself bound by the Protocol annexed to the Hague Act (1960).
Luxembourg
22-02-1979
The Kingdom of Belgium, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
have introduced the Uniform Benelux Designs Law into their national legislation by
virtue of the provisions of the Benelux Designs Convention, signed at Brussels on
October 25, 1966.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 13 of the said Convention, the Convention
entered into force on January 1, 1974, and the Uniform Law on January 1, 1975.
Considering Article 30 of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit
of Industrial Designs, as revised at The Hague on November 28, 1960, and amended by
Article 7(3) of the Complementary Act of Stockholm of July 14, 1967, to the said Agreement,
Considering Articles 5 and 8 of the Protocol of Geneva to the Hague Agreement Concerning
the International Deposit of International Designs, of August 29, 1975,
The Government of the [Kingdom of Belgium] [Grand Duchy of Luxembourg] [Kingdom of
the Netherlands] has the honor to notify the Director General of the World Intellectual
Property Organization of the following:
1. An Office common to the three Benelux countries (Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands)
has been instituted under the name "Benelux Designs Office."
The seat of the Office is at The Hague (the Netherlands). The Benelux Designs Office
was substituted for the national Office of each Benelux country as from January 1,
1975.
2. The application of the Convention referred to above shall be confined to the territories
of the High Contracting Parties in Europe, in accordance with Article 11 thereof.
These territories shall be deemed to be a single State for the application of Articles
2 to 17 of the 1960 Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit
of Industrial Designs and for the application of Articles 2 and 3 of the 1975 Geneva
Protocol to the said Agreement.
One consequence of territorial unification to which attention should be drawn is that
a renunciation--limited to part of the Benelux territory--of protection resulting
from an international deposit shall be effective throughout that territory, notwithstanding
any statement to the contrary made by the proprietor (Article 18(2) of the Uniform
Benelux Law).
Similarly, assignments or other transfers not made for the entire Benelux territory
shall be null and void (Article 13 of the Uniform Benelux Law).
In addition, no limitation of a license, other than a restriction as to its duration,
shall have any effect regarding the application of the Uniform Law (Article 13(2)
of the Uniform Benelux Law).
The Benelux Designs office shall in future be entitled to receive payment on behalf
of the three Countries of the fees referred to in Article 15, paragraph (1), item
2, of the 1960 Act of The Hague Agreement, which is applicable also by virtue of the
1975 Geneva Protocol, it being understood that those countries shall not be treated
as separate countries for the application of the said provision. The three Governments
shall demand to be officially notified of the total amounts distributed according
to this procedure.
3. It is evident that the three Benelux countries shall remain three separate countries
with respect to their representation in the Assembly of the Hague Special Union. They
express the wish that their common Office, that is, the Benelux Designs Office, may
be represented by its Director, in the capacity of observer in the said Assembly and
at meetings concerning The Hague Union.
4. With a view to simplifying access to documentation concerning international deposits,
Belgium and Luxembourg express the wish that publications and notifications from the
International Bureau may be addressed also to their Industrial Property Services in
Brussels and Luxembourg.
Morocco
14-06-2018
Declaration as required under Rule 36(2) of the Common Regulations Under the 1999 Act and the 1960 Act of the Hague Agreement, specifying that the maximum duration of protection provided for by the legislation of Morocco in respect of industrial designs is 25 years.
Netherlands, the Kingdom of the
22-02-1979
The Kingdom of Belgium, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
have introduced the Uniform Benelux Designs Law into their national legislation by
virtue of the provisions of the Benelux Designs Convention, signed at Brussels on
October 25, 1966.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 13 of the said Convention, the Convention
entered into force on January 1, 1974, and the Uniform Law on January 1, 1975.
Considering Article 30 of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit
of Industrial Designs, as revised at The Hague on November 28, 1960, and amended by
Article 7(3) of the Complementary Act of Stockholm of July 14, 1967, to the said Agreement,
Considering Articles 5 and 8 of the Protocol of Geneva to the Hague Agreement Concerning
the International Deposit of International Designs, of August 29, 1975,
The Government of the [Kingdom of Belgium] [Grand Duchy of Luxembourg] [Kingdom of
the Netherlands] has the honor to notify the Director General of the World Intellectual
Property Organization of the following:
1. An Office common to the three Benelux countries (Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands)
has been instituted under the name "Benelux Designs Office."
The seat of the Office is at The Hague (the Netherlands). The Benelux Designs Office
was substituted for the national Office of each Benelux country as from January 1,
1975.
2. The application of the Convention referred to above shall be confined to the territories
of the High Contracting Parties in Europe, in accordance with Article 11 thereof.
These territories shall be deemed to be a single State for the application of Articles
2 to 17 of the 1960 Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit
of Industrial Designs and for the application of Articles 2 and 3 of the 1975 Geneva
Protocol to the said Agreement.
One consequence of territorial unification to which attention should be drawn is that
a renunciation--limited to part of the Benelux territory--of protection resulting
from an international deposit shall be effective throughout that territory, notwithstanding
any statement to the contrary made by the proprietor (Article 18(2) of the Uniform
Benelux Law).
Similarly, assignments or other transfers not made for the entire Benelux territory
shall be null and void (Article 13 of the Uniform Benelux Law).
In addition, no limitation of a license, other than a restriction as to its duration,
shall have any effect regarding the application of the Uniform Law (Article 13(2)
of the Uniform Benelux Law).
The Benelux Designs office shall in future be entitled to receive payment on behalf
of the three Countries of the fees referred to in Article 15, paragraph (1), item
2, of the 1960 Act of The Hague Agreement, which is applicable also by virtue of the
1975 Geneva Protocol, it being understood that those countries shall not be treated
as separate countries for the application of the said provision. The three Governments
shall demand to be officially notified of the total amounts distributed according
to this procedure.
3. It is evident that the three Benelux countries shall remain three separate countries
with respect to their representation in the Assembly of the Hague Special Union. They
express the wish that their common Office, that is, the Benelux Designs Office, may
be represented by its Director, in the capacity of observer in the said Assembly and
at meetings concerning The Hague Union.
4. With a view to simplifying access to documentation concerning international deposits,
Belgium and Luxembourg express the wish that publications and notifications from the
International Bureau may be addressed also to their Industrial Property Services in
Brussels and Luxembourg.
Ukraine
30-05-2020
[…] the declarations as required under Article 17(3)(c) of the Geneva Act (1999) of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs, and Rule 36(2) of the Common Regulations Under the 1999 Act and the 1960 Act of the Hague Agreement, specifying that the maximum duration of protection provided for by the legislation of Ukraine in respect of industrial designs is 25 years.