Print
Download XMLConvention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Parties with reservations, declarations and objections
| Party | Reservations / Declarations | Objections |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | Yes | No |
| Denmark | Yes | No |
| Estonia | Yes | No |
| France | Yes | No |
| Greece | Yes | No |
| India | Yes | No |
| Luxembourg | Yes | No |
| Portugal | Yes | No |
| Romania | Yes | No |
| Slovakia | Yes | No |
Belgium
27-04-1929
Reserves the right to limit the obligation mentioned in Article 1 to contracts which
are considered as commercial under its national law.
Denmark
25-04-1929
Under Danish law, arbitral awards made by an Arbitral Tribunal do not immediately
become operative; it is necessary in each case, in order to make an award operative,
to apply to the ordinary Courts of Law. In the course of the proceedings, however,
the arbitral award will generally be accepted by such courts without further examination
as a basis of the final judgments in the affair.
Estonia
16-05-1929
Reserves the right to limit the obligation mentioned in Article 1 to contracts which
are considered as commercial under its national law.
France
13-05-1929
Reserves the right to limit the obligation mentioned in Article 1 to contracts which
are considered as commercial under its national law.
Greece
15-01-1930
The Hellenic Government reserves the right to limit the obligation mentioned in Article
1 to contracts which are considered as commercial under its national law.
India
23-10-1937
India reserves the right to limit the obligation mentioned in the first paragraph
of Article 1 to contracts which are considered as commercial under its national law.
Luxembourg
15-09-1930
Reserves the right to limit the obligation mentioned in Article 1 to contracts which
are considered as commercial under its national law.
Portugal
10-12-1930
The Portuguese Government reserves the right to limit the obligation mentioned in
Article 1 to contracts which are considered as commercial under its national law.
Romania
22-06-1931
Reserves the right to limit the obligation mentioned in Article 1 to contracts which
are considered as commercial under its national law.
Slovakia
23-05-1993
[...] decided on to adhere to the reservation made by the Former Czechoslovak Republic:
The Czechoslovak Republic does not intend to invalidate in any way the bilateral treaties
concluded by it with various States, which regulate the questions referred to in the
present Convention by provisions going beyond the provisions of the Convention.